Abstract
We present an analysis of imaging murine embryos at various embryonic developmental stages (embryonic day 9.5, 11.5, and 13.5) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical projection tomography (OPT). We demonstrate that while OCT was capable of rapid highresolution live 3D imaging, its limited penetration depth prevented visualization of deeper structures, particularly in later stage embryos. In contrast, OPT was able to image the whole embryos, but could not be used in vivo because the embryos must be fixed and cleared. Moreover, the fixation process significantly altered the embryo morphology, which was quantified by the volume of the eye-globes before and after fixation. All of these factors should be weighed when determining which imaging modality one should use to achieve particular goals of a study.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2295-2310 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Biomedical Optics Express |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2016 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biotechnology
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Applicability, usability, and limitations of murine embryonic imaging with optical coherence tomography and optical projection tomography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS