Abstract
We report a case of a 56-year-old man with traumatic aortic rupture (TAR) sustained in a motor vehicle accident diagnosed by helical computed tomography, aortography, and transesophageal echocardiography. A large majority of patients with TAR never make it to the hospital, and for those who do, a timely diagnosis is critical for survival. We discuss the merits and pitfalls of the three imaging modalities.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 31-33 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Emergency Radiology |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2006 |
Keywords
- Aorta
- Blunt trauma
- Echocardiography
- Rupture
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Aortic rupture: Comparison of three imaging modalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS