TY - JOUR
T1 - Aortic Regurgitation
T2 - Review of the Diagnostic Criteria and the Management Guidelines
AU - Malahfji, Maan
AU - Saeed, Mujtaba
AU - Zoghbi, William A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Purpose of Review: The evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR) has advanced from physical examination and angiography towards evidence based non-invasive quantitative methods, primarily with echocardiography and more recently with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). This review highlights the guidelines and recent evidence in the diagnosis and management of AR; and outlines future areas of research. Recent Findings: Contemporary large cohorts of AR patients studied with echocardiography and CMR suggest that the left ventricular remodeling and systolic function triggers for intervention may be lower than previously recommended in the guidelines and emphasize the importance of LV volumes in risk stratification. Summary: Important gaps of knowledge in the quantitation of AR severity and patient risk stratification were fulfilled recently. Potential thresholds for intervention using ventricular volumes and CMR quantitative findings were recently described. The criteria for what constitutes hemodynamically significant AR and the optimal timing of intervention AR deserve further study.
AB - Purpose of Review: The evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR) has advanced from physical examination and angiography towards evidence based non-invasive quantitative methods, primarily with echocardiography and more recently with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). This review highlights the guidelines and recent evidence in the diagnosis and management of AR; and outlines future areas of research. Recent Findings: Contemporary large cohorts of AR patients studied with echocardiography and CMR suggest that the left ventricular remodeling and systolic function triggers for intervention may be lower than previously recommended in the guidelines and emphasize the importance of LV volumes in risk stratification. Summary: Important gaps of knowledge in the quantitation of AR severity and patient risk stratification were fulfilled recently. Potential thresholds for intervention using ventricular volumes and CMR quantitative findings were recently described. The criteria for what constitutes hemodynamically significant AR and the optimal timing of intervention AR deserve further study.
KW - Aortic regurgitation
KW - Aortic valve surgery
KW - Cardiac magnetic resonance
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Management guidelines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171306375&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85171306375&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11886-023-01955-x
DO - 10.1007/s11886-023-01955-x
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37715804
AN - SCOPUS:85171306375
SN - 1523-3782
VL - 25
SP - 1373
EP - 1380
JO - Current Cardiology Reports
JF - Current Cardiology Reports
IS - 10
ER -