TY - JOUR
T1 - An ice test for the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis
AU - Golnik, Karl C.
AU - Pena, Raul
AU - Lee, Andrew G.
AU - Eggenberger, Eric R.
PY - 1999/7/1
Y1 - 1999/7/1
N2 - Objective: To determine whether ice application to a ptotic eyelid can differentiate myasthenic from nonmyasthenic ptosis. Design: Prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, comparative trial. Participants: Twenty patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and ptosis were evaluated in the neuro- ophthalmology service. Control Subjects: Twenty patients with nonmyasthenic ptosis evaluated in the same locale. Methods: Palpebral fissures were measured before and immediately after a 2-minute application of ice to the ptotic eyelid. Main Outcome Measures: The difference in palpebral fissures in millimeters before and after ice application. Two or more millimeters of improvement after ice application was considered a positive ice test result. Results: A positive ice test result was noted in 16 of the 20 (80%) patients with MG and in none of the 20 patients without MG (P < 0.001). Of the 4 patients with MG and complete ptosis, 3 had a negative ice test result. Conclusions: The ice test is a simple, short, specific, and relatively sensitive test for the diagnosis of myasthenic ptosis. The sensitivity of the ice test in patients with complete ptosis decreases considerably.
AB - Objective: To determine whether ice application to a ptotic eyelid can differentiate myasthenic from nonmyasthenic ptosis. Design: Prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, comparative trial. Participants: Twenty patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) and ptosis were evaluated in the neuro- ophthalmology service. Control Subjects: Twenty patients with nonmyasthenic ptosis evaluated in the same locale. Methods: Palpebral fissures were measured before and immediately after a 2-minute application of ice to the ptotic eyelid. Main Outcome Measures: The difference in palpebral fissures in millimeters before and after ice application. Two or more millimeters of improvement after ice application was considered a positive ice test result. Results: A positive ice test result was noted in 16 of the 20 (80%) patients with MG and in none of the 20 patients without MG (P < 0.001). Of the 4 patients with MG and complete ptosis, 3 had a negative ice test result. Conclusions: The ice test is a simple, short, specific, and relatively sensitive test for the diagnosis of myasthenic ptosis. The sensitivity of the ice test in patients with complete ptosis decreases considerably.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033511147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033511147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00709-5
DO - 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00709-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 10406606
AN - SCOPUS:0033511147
VL - 106
SP - 1282
EP - 1286
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
SN - 0161-6420
IS - 7
ER -