TY - JOUR
T1 - Amyloid PET in Sporadic Early- Versus Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease
T2 - Comparison of the LEADS and ADNI Cohorts
AU - the LEADS Consortium for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
AU - Lagarde, Julien
AU - Maiti, Piyush
AU - Schonhaut, Daniel R.
AU - Blazhenets, Ganna
AU - Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu
AU - Eloyan, Ani
AU - Thangarajah, Maryanne
AU - Taurone, Alexander
AU - Allen, Isabel Elaine
AU - Soleimani-Meigooni, David N.
AU - Zeltzer, Ehud
AU - Windon, Charles
AU - Abu Raya, Maison
AU - Vrillon, Agathe
AU - Smith, Karen
AU - Shankar, Ranjani
AU - Amuiri, Alinda
AU - Rocha, Salma
AU - Hammers, Dustin B.
AU - Dage, Jeffrey L.
AU - Nudelman, Kelly N.
AU - Kirby, Kala
AU - Aisen, Paul
AU - Koeppe, Robert
AU - Landau, Susan M.
AU - Carrillo, Maria C.
AU - Touroutoglou, Alexandra
AU - Brickhouse, Michael
AU - Vemuri, Prashanthi
AU - Beckett, Laurel
AU - Raman, Rema
AU - Atri, Alireza
AU - Day, Gregory S.
AU - Duara, Ranjan
AU - Graff-Radford, Neill R.
AU - Honig, Lawrence S.
AU - Jones, David T.
AU - Masdeu, Joseph C.
AU - Mendez, Mario F.
AU - Womack, Kyle
AU - Musiek, Erik
AU - Onyike, Chiadi U.
AU - Riddle, Meghan
AU - Grant, Ian M.
AU - Rogalski, Emily
AU - Johnson, Erik C.B.
AU - Salloway, Stephen
AU - Sha, Sharon
AU - Turner, R. Scott
AU - Wingo, Thomas S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Neurological Association.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: Early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) differ in many respects. Here, we address the issue of possible differences in fibrillar amyloid pathology as measured by positron emission tomography (PET), which remains unresolved due to the lack of large-scale comparative studies. Methods: Three hundred ninety-nine cognitively impaired participants younger than 65 years of age from the multicenter Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) and 450 cognitively impaired participants older than 65 years from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) underwent clinical assessment, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and amyloid PET and were included in this study. We compared amyloid PET outcomes (positivity rate based on visual read and quantified tracer uptake expressed as Centiloids [CLs]) between the 2 cohorts and studied their association with age, sex, APOE genotype, and cognition. Results: The amyloid positivity rate was higher in LEADS (78%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 74–82) than in ADNI (71%, 95% CI = 67–75, p = 0.02). Lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and APOE4 genotype increased the odds of amyloid positivity in both cohorts. Visually positive scans had higher CLs in LEADS (EOAD, mean = 95.3 ± 26.1) than in ADNI (LOAD, mean = 80.9 ± 36.8, p < 0.0001), predominantly in parietal cortex/precuneus, superior temporal, and frontal cortices. In amyloid-positive patients, (1) CLs were higher in female patients in both cohorts; (2) APOE4 carriership was associated with lower CLs in EOAD, which was not observed in LOAD; and (3) correlations between CLs and MMSE scores were significantly stronger in EOAD than in LOAD. Interpretation: Differences in the burden of amyloid pathology may contribute to differences in clinical and anatomic patterns in sporadic EOAD and LOAD, and have implications for optimizing therapeutic strategies in each group. ANN NEUROL 2025.
AB - Objective: Early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) differ in many respects. Here, we address the issue of possible differences in fibrillar amyloid pathology as measured by positron emission tomography (PET), which remains unresolved due to the lack of large-scale comparative studies. Methods: Three hundred ninety-nine cognitively impaired participants younger than 65 years of age from the multicenter Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) and 450 cognitively impaired participants older than 65 years from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) underwent clinical assessment, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and amyloid PET and were included in this study. We compared amyloid PET outcomes (positivity rate based on visual read and quantified tracer uptake expressed as Centiloids [CLs]) between the 2 cohorts and studied their association with age, sex, APOE genotype, and cognition. Results: The amyloid positivity rate was higher in LEADS (78%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 74–82) than in ADNI (71%, 95% CI = 67–75, p = 0.02). Lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and APOE4 genotype increased the odds of amyloid positivity in both cohorts. Visually positive scans had higher CLs in LEADS (EOAD, mean = 95.3 ± 26.1) than in ADNI (LOAD, mean = 80.9 ± 36.8, p < 0.0001), predominantly in parietal cortex/precuneus, superior temporal, and frontal cortices. In amyloid-positive patients, (1) CLs were higher in female patients in both cohorts; (2) APOE4 carriership was associated with lower CLs in EOAD, which was not observed in LOAD; and (3) correlations between CLs and MMSE scores were significantly stronger in EOAD than in LOAD. Interpretation: Differences in the burden of amyloid pathology may contribute to differences in clinical and anatomic patterns in sporadic EOAD and LOAD, and have implications for optimizing therapeutic strategies in each group. ANN NEUROL 2025.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000825224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105000825224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ana.27233
DO - 10.1002/ana.27233
M3 - Article
C2 - 40091774
AN - SCOPUS:105000825224
SN - 0364-5134
JO - Annals of Neurology
JF - Annals of Neurology
ER -