Alternative evidence in drug development and regulatory science

Nora Janjan, Patrick J. Silva, Kenneth S. Ramos, Marcia G. Ory, Matthew L. Smith

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

While Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and Real-World Evidence (RWE) have traditionally served complementary roles, the role of RWE has been expanded by legislation and regulatory mandates. This expanded role reflects the evolution of clinical trial endpoints that include precision medicine, pharmacogenomics, and health economics and outcomes research. These clinical trial endpoints influence both regulatory approval, reimbursement, and health policy. The process of drug development using RCTs is slow, expensive, and generally lacks patient diversity. RWE now ranges from its traditional role in Phase IV pharmacovigilance to external controls in prospective clinical trials for FDA submissions. In the context of accepted standards for RCTs and management of mega-data through artificial intelligence, the role of RWE has evolved to advance patient care in a timely and resource-efficient manner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationComprehensive Precision Medicine, First Edition, Volume 1-2
PublisherElsevier
Pages180-196
Number of pages17
Volume2
ISBN (Electronic)9780128240106
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Drug development
  • External control arm
  • Pharmacogenomics
  • Precision medicine
  • Real world data
  • Real world evidence
  • Regulatory science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative evidence in drug development and regulatory science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this