TY - JOUR
T1 - Allogeneic transplantation provides durable remission in a subset of DLBCL patients relapsing after autologous transplantation
AU - Fenske, Timothy S.
AU - Ahn, Kwang W.
AU - Graff, Tara M.
AU - DiGilio, Alyssa
AU - Bashir, Qaiser
AU - Kamble, Rammurti T.
AU - Ayala, Ernesto
AU - Bacher, Ulrike
AU - Brammer, Jonathan E.
AU - Cairo, Mitchell
AU - Chen, Andy
AU - Chen, Yi Bin
AU - Chhabra, Saurabh
AU - D'Souza, Anita
AU - Farooq, Umar
AU - Freytes, Cesar
AU - Ganguly, Siddhartha
AU - Hertzberg, Mark
AU - Inwards, David
AU - Jaglowski, Samantha
AU - Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.
AU - Lazarus, Hillard M.
AU - Nathan, Sunita
AU - Pawarode, Attaphol
AU - Perales, Miguel Angel
AU - Reddy, Nishitha
AU - Seo, Sachiko
AU - Sureda, Anna
AU - Smith, Sonali M.
AU - Hamadani, Mehdi
N1 - Funding Information:
Morgan Geronime for administrative Support. The CIBMTR is supported by Public Health Service Grant/Cooperative Agreement U24-CA076518 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); a Grant/Cooperative Agreement 5U10HL069294 from NHLBI and NCI; a contract HHSH250201200016C with Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/DHHS); two Grants N00014-13-1-0039 and N00014-14-1-0028.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - For diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients progressing after autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT), allogeneic HCT (alloHCT) is often considered, although limited information is available to guide patient selection. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we identified 503 patients who underwent alloHCT after disease progression/relapse following a prior autoHCT. The 3-year probabilities of non-relapse mortality, progression/relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30, 38, 31 and 37% respectively. Factors associated with inferior PFS on multivariate analysis included Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80, chemoresistance, autoHCT to alloHCT interval <1-year and myeloablative conditioning. Factors associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis included KPS<80, chemoresistance and myeloablative conditioning. Three adverse prognostic factors were used to construct a prognostic model for PFS, including KPS<80 (4 points), autoHCT to alloHCT interval <1-year (2 points) and chemoresistant disease at alloHCT (5 points). This CIBMTR prognostic model classified patients into four groups: low-risk (0 points), intermediate-risk (2-5 points), high-risk (6-9 points) or very high-risk (11 points), predicting 3-year PFS of 40, 32, 11 and 6%, respectively, with 3-year OS probabilities of 43, 39, 19 and 11% respectively. In conclusion, the CIBMTR prognostic model identifies a subgroup of DLBCL patients experiencing long-term survival with alloHCT after a failed prior autoHCT.
AB - For diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients progressing after autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT), allogeneic HCT (alloHCT) is often considered, although limited information is available to guide patient selection. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we identified 503 patients who underwent alloHCT after disease progression/relapse following a prior autoHCT. The 3-year probabilities of non-relapse mortality, progression/relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30, 38, 31 and 37% respectively. Factors associated with inferior PFS on multivariate analysis included Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80, chemoresistance, autoHCT to alloHCT interval <1-year and myeloablative conditioning. Factors associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis included KPS<80, chemoresistance and myeloablative conditioning. Three adverse prognostic factors were used to construct a prognostic model for PFS, including KPS<80 (4 points), autoHCT to alloHCT interval <1-year (2 points) and chemoresistant disease at alloHCT (5 points). This CIBMTR prognostic model classified patients into four groups: low-risk (0 points), intermediate-risk (2-5 points), high-risk (6-9 points) or very high-risk (11 points), predicting 3-year PFS of 40, 32, 11 and 6%, respectively, with 3-year OS probabilities of 43, 39, 19 and 11% respectively. In conclusion, the CIBMTR prognostic model identifies a subgroup of DLBCL patients experiencing long-term survival with alloHCT after a failed prior autoHCT.
KW - Allogeneic transplantation
KW - DLBCL
KW - Prior autologous transplan
KW - Prognostic score
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978080661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978080661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bjh.14046
DO - 10.1111/bjh.14046
M3 - Article
C2 - 26989808
AN - SCOPUS:84978080661
VL - 174
SP - 235
EP - 248
JO - British Journal of Haematology
JF - British Journal of Haematology
SN - 0007-1048
IS - 2
ER -