TY - JOUR
T1 - AI-based, automated chamber volumetry from gated, non-contrast CT
AU - Jacob, Athira J.
AU - Abdelkarim, Ola
AU - Zook, Salma
AU - Kragholm, Kristian Hay
AU - Gupta, Prantik
AU - Cocker, Myra
AU - Giraldo, Juan Ramirez
AU - Doherty, Jim O.
AU - Schoebinger, Max
AU - Schwemmer, Chris
AU - Gulsun, Mehmet A.
AU - Rapaka, Saikiran
AU - Sharma, Puneet
AU - Chang, Su Min
N1 - Funding Information:
SMC receives research grant from Siemens Healthineers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
PY - 2023/9/1
Y1 - 2023/9/1
N2 - Background: Accurate chamber volumetry from gated, non-contrast cardiac CT (NCCT) scans can be useful for potential screening of heart failure. Objectives: To validate a new, fully automated, AI-based method for cardiac volume and myocardial mass quantification from NCCT scans compared to contrasted CT Angiography (CCTA). Methods: Of a retrospectively collected cohort of 1051 consecutive patients, 420 patients had both NCCT and CCTA scans at mid-diastolic phase, excluding patients with cardiac devices. Ground truth values were obtained from the CCTA scans. Results: The NCCT volume computation shows good agreement with ground truth values. Volume differences [95% CI ] and correlation coefficients were: -9.6 [–45; 26] mL, r = 0.98 for LV Total, −5.4 [–24; 13] mL, r = 0.95 for LA, −8.7 [-45; 28] mL, r = 0.94 for RV, −5.2 [–27; 17] mL, r = 0.92 for RA, −3.2 [–42; 36] mL, r = 0.91 for LV blood pool, and −6.7 [–39; 26] g, r = 0.94 for LV wall mass, respectively. Mean relative volume errors of less than 7% were obtained for all chambers. Conclusions: Fully automated assessment of chamber volumes from NCCT scans is feasible and correlates well with volumes obtained from contrast study.
AB - Background: Accurate chamber volumetry from gated, non-contrast cardiac CT (NCCT) scans can be useful for potential screening of heart failure. Objectives: To validate a new, fully automated, AI-based method for cardiac volume and myocardial mass quantification from NCCT scans compared to contrasted CT Angiography (CCTA). Methods: Of a retrospectively collected cohort of 1051 consecutive patients, 420 patients had both NCCT and CCTA scans at mid-diastolic phase, excluding patients with cardiac devices. Ground truth values were obtained from the CCTA scans. Results: The NCCT volume computation shows good agreement with ground truth values. Volume differences [95% CI ] and correlation coefficients were: -9.6 [–45; 26] mL, r = 0.98 for LV Total, −5.4 [–24; 13] mL, r = 0.95 for LA, −8.7 [-45; 28] mL, r = 0.94 for RV, −5.2 [–27; 17] mL, r = 0.92 for RA, −3.2 [–42; 36] mL, r = 0.91 for LV blood pool, and −6.7 [–39; 26] g, r = 0.94 for LV wall mass, respectively. Mean relative volume errors of less than 7% were obtained for all chambers. Conclusions: Fully automated assessment of chamber volumes from NCCT scans is feasible and correlates well with volumes obtained from contrast study.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Cardiac volumetry
KW - Non-contrast CT
KW - Screening
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
KW - Computed Tomography Angiography/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Artificial Intelligence
KW - Retrospective Studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168618085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85168618085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcct.2023.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jcct.2023.08.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 37612232
AN - SCOPUS:85168618085
SN - 1934-5925
VL - 17
SP - 336
EP - 340
JO - Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
JF - Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
IS - 5
ER -