TY - JOUR
T1 - Aggressive end-of-life care across gradients of cognitive impairment in nursing home patients with metastatic cancer
AU - Koroukian, Siran M.
AU - Douglas, Sara L.
AU - Vu, Long
AU - Fein, Hannah L.
AU - Gairola, Richa
AU - Warner, David F.
AU - Schiltz, Nicholas K.
AU - Cullen, Jennifer
AU - Owusu, Cynthia
AU - Sajatovic, Martha
AU - Rose, Johnie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Background: Studies examining end-of-life (EOL) care in older cancer patients are scarce, and prior studies have not accounted for gradients of cognitive impairment (COG-I). We examine EOL care patterns across COG-I gradients, hypothesizing that greater COG-I severity is associated with lower odds of receiving aggressive EOL care. Methods: Using data from the linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) -Medicare -Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, we identified patients with nursing facility stays (NFS) and who died with metastatic cancer from 2013 to 2017. Markers of aggressive EOL care were: cancer-directed treatment, intensive care unit admission, >1 emergency department visit, or >1 hospitalization in the last 30 days of life, hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life, and in-hospital death. In addition to descriptive analysis, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the independent association between COG-I severity and receipt of aggressive EOL care. Results: Of the 40,833 patients in our study population, 49.2% were cognitively intact; 24.4% had mild COG-I; 19.7% had moderate COG-I; and 6.7% had severe COG-I. The percent of patients who received aggressive EOL care was 62.6% and 74.2% among those who were cognitively intact and those with severe COG-I, respectively. Compared with cognitively intact patients, those with severe COG-I had 86% higher odds of receiving any type of aggressive EOL care (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.86 (95% confidence interval: 1.70–2.04)), which were primarily associated with higher odds of in-hospital death. The odds of in-hospital death associated with severe COG-I were higher among those with short- than with long-term stays (aOR:2.58 (2.35–2.84) and aOR:1.40 (1.17–1.67), respectively). Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, aggressive EOL care in older metastatic cancer patients with NFS was highest among those suffering severe COG-I. These findings can inform the development of interventions to help reduce aggressive EOL care in this patient population.
AB - Background: Studies examining end-of-life (EOL) care in older cancer patients are scarce, and prior studies have not accounted for gradients of cognitive impairment (COG-I). We examine EOL care patterns across COG-I gradients, hypothesizing that greater COG-I severity is associated with lower odds of receiving aggressive EOL care. Methods: Using data from the linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) -Medicare -Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, we identified patients with nursing facility stays (NFS) and who died with metastatic cancer from 2013 to 2017. Markers of aggressive EOL care were: cancer-directed treatment, intensive care unit admission, >1 emergency department visit, or >1 hospitalization in the last 30 days of life, hospice enrollment in the last 3 days of life, and in-hospital death. In addition to descriptive analysis, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the independent association between COG-I severity and receipt of aggressive EOL care. Results: Of the 40,833 patients in our study population, 49.2% were cognitively intact; 24.4% had mild COG-I; 19.7% had moderate COG-I; and 6.7% had severe COG-I. The percent of patients who received aggressive EOL care was 62.6% and 74.2% among those who were cognitively intact and those with severe COG-I, respectively. Compared with cognitively intact patients, those with severe COG-I had 86% higher odds of receiving any type of aggressive EOL care (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.86 (95% confidence interval: 1.70–2.04)), which were primarily associated with higher odds of in-hospital death. The odds of in-hospital death associated with severe COG-I were higher among those with short- than with long-term stays (aOR:2.58 (2.35–2.84) and aOR:1.40 (1.17–1.67), respectively). Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, aggressive EOL care in older metastatic cancer patients with NFS was highest among those suffering severe COG-I. These findings can inform the development of interventions to help reduce aggressive EOL care in this patient population.
KW - aggressive end-of-life care
KW - metastatic cancer
KW - nursing home status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166431108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85166431108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgs.18526
DO - 10.1111/jgs.18526
M3 - Article
C2 - 37515440
AN - SCOPUS:85166431108
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 71
SP - 3546
EP - 3553
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 11
ER -