Advanced practice nurses and program evaluation: Can solicitation of an e-mail address lead to longitudinal selection bias?

Justin B. Dickerson, Matthew Lee Smith, Ashley Mckinley, Marcia G. Ory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To identify if survey respondents providing an e-mail address for program evaluation represent a risk of longitudinal selection bias. Methods: A survey was administered to advanced practice nurses after a chronic disease self-management presentation. Chi-square statistics and logistic regression were used to identify variables associated with successful solicitation of an e-mail address. Results: Relative to those 'not at all likely' to suggest someone in their practice train to become a certified chronic disease self-management facilitator, those stating they were 'very likely' or 'quite likely' to take this action were 10.20 and 13.60 times more likely, respectively, to provide an e-mail address. These differences were statistically significant (OR = 10.20, CI = 2.91-35.77, p < 0.001 and OR = 13.60, CI = 2.14-86.40, p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusion: Soliciting an e-mail address could pose a risk of selection bias when developing a longitudinal sample for further analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-176
Number of pages8
JournalContemporary Nurse
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Keywords

  • Advanced practice nursing
  • Longitudinal research
  • Program evaluation
  • Selection bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advanced practice nurses and program evaluation: Can solicitation of an e-mail address lead to longitudinal selection bias?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this