TY - JOUR
T1 - Acute care for renal colic in Canadian healthcare - a commentary on emergency department patient flow metrics and treatment options
AU - on behalf of the Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group
AU - Cheung, Douglas C.
AU - Wallis, Christopher J.D.
AU - Possee, Simon
AU - Tajzler, Camilla
AU - Anidjar, Maurice
AU - Barrett, Keith
AU - Deklaj, Tom
AU - Drachenberg, Darrel E.
AU - Evans, Howard
AU - French, Christopher
AU - Gotto, Geoffrey
AU - Izard, Jason
AU - Jain, Umesh
AU - Kawakami, Jun
AU - Kulkarni, Girish S.
AU - Lee, Jason
AU - McCracken, Jeffrey
AU - McGregor, Thomas
AU - Richard, Patrick O.
AU - Rowe, Neal E.
AU - Sabbagh, Robert
AU - St. Martin, Blair
AU - Tatzel, Stephanie
AU - Touma, Naji
AU - Widmer, Hugues
AU - Wiesenthal, Joshua
AU - Yang, Brian
AU - Zorn, Kevin C.
AU - Kapoor, Anil
AU - Finelli, Antonio
AU - Satkunasivam, Raj
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Canadian Urological Association
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Introduction: Partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard in the management of small renal masses. However, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is associated with a steep learning curve, and optimal, standardized techniques for time-efficient hemostasis are poorly described. Given the relative lack of evidence, the goal was to describe a set of actionable guiding principles, through an expert working panel, for urologists to approach hemostasis without compromising warm ischemia or oncological outcomes. Methods: A three-step modified Delphi method was used to achieve expert agreement on the best practices for hemostasis in MIPN. Panelists were recruited from the Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group, which represent all provinces, academic and community practices, and fellowship- and non-fellowship-trained surgeons. Thirty-two (round 1) and 46 (round 2) panellists participated in survey questionnaires, and 22 attended the in-person consensus meeting.
AB - Introduction: Partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard in the management of small renal masses. However, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is associated with a steep learning curve, and optimal, standardized techniques for time-efficient hemostasis are poorly described. Given the relative lack of evidence, the goal was to describe a set of actionable guiding principles, through an expert working panel, for urologists to approach hemostasis without compromising warm ischemia or oncological outcomes. Methods: A three-step modified Delphi method was used to achieve expert agreement on the best practices for hemostasis in MIPN. Panelists were recruited from the Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group, which represent all provinces, academic and community practices, and fellowship- and non-fellowship-trained surgeons. Thirty-two (round 1) and 46 (round 2) panellists participated in survey questionnaires, and 22 attended the in-person consensus meeting.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090925503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090925503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5489/CUAJ.6823
DO - 10.5489/CUAJ.6823
M3 - Article
C2 - 33626319
AN - SCOPUS:85090925503
SN - 1911-6470
VL - 14
SP - 265
EP - 266
JO - Journal of the Canadian Urological Association
JF - Journal of the Canadian Urological Association
IS - 8
ER -