TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of MR imaging and MR spectroscopy for detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Zheng, Danping
AU - Guo, Zhiyong
AU - Schroder, Paul M.
AU - Zheng, Zhouying
AU - Lu, Yao
AU - Gu, Jincui
AU - He, Xiaoshun
PY - 2017/1
Y1 - 2017/1
N2 - Purpose: To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis (HS) in living liver donor candidates. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed to find studies on the diagnostic and quantitative accuracy of MR imaging for assessment of HS in liver donors. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used, and patient selection, index text, reference standard, and study flow and timing were assessed to evaluate the quality of each included study. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the area under the curve were estimated by using hierarchical summary ROC and bivariate randomeffects models. Results: Eight studies involving 934 subjects were eligible for the meta-analysis. For detection of HS with MR imaging and/ or MR spectroscopy in living liver donors, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio, respectively, were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.95), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.89), 5.53 (95% CI: 3.71, 8.25), and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.31). The area under the curve was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.94). For detection of substantial HS (.10% to .30% HS at liver pathologic examination, as defined in each study), these corresponding diagnostic estimates were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.95), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.93), 8.30 (95% CI: 5.47, 12.59), 0.10 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.21), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97), respectively. Moderate heterogeneity was detected. No publication bias was detected (P = .12). Conclusion: MR imaging and MR spectroscopy show high sensitivity and specificity for detection of HS, especially when HS is substantial, and may be useful for noninvasive evaluation of HS in living liver donors.
AB - Purpose: To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis (HS) in living liver donor candidates. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed to find studies on the diagnostic and quantitative accuracy of MR imaging for assessment of HS in liver donors. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used, and patient selection, index text, reference standard, and study flow and timing were assessed to evaluate the quality of each included study. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the area under the curve were estimated by using hierarchical summary ROC and bivariate randomeffects models. Results: Eight studies involving 934 subjects were eligible for the meta-analysis. For detection of HS with MR imaging and/ or MR spectroscopy in living liver donors, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio, respectively, were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.95), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.89), 5.53 (95% CI: 3.71, 8.25), and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.31). The area under the curve was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.94). For detection of substantial HS (.10% to .30% HS at liver pathologic examination, as defined in each study), these corresponding diagnostic estimates were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.95), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.93), 8.30 (95% CI: 5.47, 12.59), 0.10 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.21), and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97), respectively. Moderate heterogeneity was detected. No publication bias was detected (P = .12). Conclusion: MR imaging and MR spectroscopy show high sensitivity and specificity for detection of HS, especially when HS is substantial, and may be useful for noninvasive evaluation of HS in living liver donors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007560354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007560354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2016152571
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2016152571
M3 - Article
C2 - 27479639
AN - SCOPUS:85007560354
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 282
SP - 92
EP - 102
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 1
ER -