TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of computed tomography for detecting hepatic steatosis in donors for liver transplantation
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Zheng, Danping
AU - Tian, Wenshuo
AU - Zheng, Zhouying
AU - Gu, Jincui
AU - Guo, Zhiyong
AU - He, Xiaoshun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2017/8
Y1 - 2017/8
N2 - Background: The accuracy of computed tomography (CT) for detecting donor hepatic steatosis (HS) before liver transplantation is not well established. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of CT for HS detection in liver donor candidates. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves, and the area under the curve (AUC) were estimated using HSROC and bivariate random-effects models. Results: Twelve studies involving 1782 subjects were eligible for this meta-analysis. For detecting significant HS (>10%-30% steatosis in liver pathology) with CT in liver donors, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.89), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96), 13.7 (95% CI: 8.1-23.1), and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12-0.33). The AUC was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96). For detecting the presence of HS, these corresponding diagnostic estimates were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.36-0.64), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95), 5.2 (95% CI: 3.1-8.9), 0.55 (95% CI: 0.42-0.72), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.83). Moderate-to-high heterogeneity was detected. Conclusion: Computed tomography shows high accuracy in detecting significant HS while poor accuracy in detecting the presence of HS in liver donors. Donors estimated to have significant HS by CT may avoid unnecessary liver biopsy.
AB - Background: The accuracy of computed tomography (CT) for detecting donor hepatic steatosis (HS) before liver transplantation is not well established. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of CT for HS detection in liver donor candidates. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves, and the area under the curve (AUC) were estimated using HSROC and bivariate random-effects models. Results: Twelve studies involving 1782 subjects were eligible for this meta-analysis. For detecting significant HS (>10%-30% steatosis in liver pathology) with CT in liver donors, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.89), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96), 13.7 (95% CI: 8.1-23.1), and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12-0.33). The AUC was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96). For detecting the presence of HS, these corresponding diagnostic estimates were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.36-0.64), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95), 5.2 (95% CI: 3.1-8.9), 0.55 (95% CI: 0.42-0.72), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.83). Moderate-to-high heterogeneity was detected. Conclusion: Computed tomography shows high accuracy in detecting significant HS while poor accuracy in detecting the presence of HS in liver donors. Donors estimated to have significant HS by CT may avoid unnecessary liver biopsy.
KW - computed tomography
KW - diagnostic accuracy
KW - fatty liver
KW - liver donation
KW - qualitative assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026380612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026380612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ctr.13013
DO - 10.1111/ctr.13013
M3 - Article
C2 - 28517493
AN - SCOPUS:85026380612
SN - 0902-0063
VL - 31
JO - Clinical Transplantation
JF - Clinical Transplantation
IS - 8
M1 - e13013
ER -