TY - JOUR
T1 - AbobotulinumtoxinA provides flexibility for the treatment of cervical dystonia with 500 U/1 mL and 500 U/2 mL dilutions
AU - Lew, Mark F.
AU - Hauser, Robert A.
AU - Isaacson, Stuart H.
AU - Truong, Daniel
AU - Patel, Atul T.
AU - Brashear, Allison
AU - Ondo, William
AU - Maisonobe, Pascal
AU - Dashtipour, Khashayar
AU - Bahroo, Laxman
AU - Wietek, Stefan
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank all patients involved in the study, as well as investigators and research staff in participating institutions, and James Otto, for his substantial contributions to the study. The authors also thank Rosemary Reinke, PhD, and Kate Katsaval, BSc, of The Medicine Group LLC (New Hope, PA, USA) for providing medical writing support, which was sponsored by Ipsen (Cambridge, MA, USA) in accordance with current Good Publication Practice guidelines (GPP3) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Introduction: Cervical dystonia (CD) is a neurologic movement disorder with potentially disabling effects and significant impact on quality of life of those affected. AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) was initially approved for a dilution of 500 U/1 mL and subsequently for a dilution of 500 U/2 mL, providing flexibility for clinicians to treat CD. Here, we explore the safety and efficacy of the 500 U/2 mL dilution versus 500 U/1 mL dilution of aboBoNT-A in a retrospective analysis based on published clinical trial data. Methods: The safety and efficacy of aboBoNT-A in patients with CD was evaluated in three multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and open-label extensions. Trials 1 (NCT00257660) and 2 (NCT00288509) evaluated the 500 U/1 mL dilution in 80 and 116 patients, respectively; Trial 3 (NCT01753310) evaluated the 500 U/2 mL dilution in 125 patients. Results: Comparison of the adjusted mean difference in TWSTRS total scores at Week 4 from baseline for aboBoNT-A in Trial 1 (−6.0; 95% CI, −10.8, −1.3), Trial 2 (−8.8; 95% CI, −12.9, −4.7), and Trial 3 (−8.7; 95% CI, −13.2, −4.2) showed similar, significant improvements. Dysphagia and muscle weakness patterns were comparable across the three trials, indicating that an increased dilution of aboBoNT-A does not result in an increased risk of diffusion-related adverse events. Conclusion: The results of these trials show that aboBoNT-A is similarly efficacious using either dilution, with similar safety and tolerability across trials. Having the 500 U/1 mL and 500 U/2 mL dilution volumes available provides further flexibility in administration, benefiting patient care.
AB - Introduction: Cervical dystonia (CD) is a neurologic movement disorder with potentially disabling effects and significant impact on quality of life of those affected. AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) was initially approved for a dilution of 500 U/1 mL and subsequently for a dilution of 500 U/2 mL, providing flexibility for clinicians to treat CD. Here, we explore the safety and efficacy of the 500 U/2 mL dilution versus 500 U/1 mL dilution of aboBoNT-A in a retrospective analysis based on published clinical trial data. Methods: The safety and efficacy of aboBoNT-A in patients with CD was evaluated in three multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and open-label extensions. Trials 1 (NCT00257660) and 2 (NCT00288509) evaluated the 500 U/1 mL dilution in 80 and 116 patients, respectively; Trial 3 (NCT01753310) evaluated the 500 U/2 mL dilution in 125 patients. Results: Comparison of the adjusted mean difference in TWSTRS total scores at Week 4 from baseline for aboBoNT-A in Trial 1 (−6.0; 95% CI, −10.8, −1.3), Trial 2 (−8.8; 95% CI, −12.9, −4.7), and Trial 3 (−8.7; 95% CI, −13.2, −4.2) showed similar, significant improvements. Dysphagia and muscle weakness patterns were comparable across the three trials, indicating that an increased dilution of aboBoNT-A does not result in an increased risk of diffusion-related adverse events. Conclusion: The results of these trials show that aboBoNT-A is similarly efficacious using either dilution, with similar safety and tolerability across trials. Having the 500 U/1 mL and 500 U/2 mL dilution volumes available provides further flexibility in administration, benefiting patient care.
KW - AbobotulinumtoxinA
KW - Cervical dystonia
KW - Dilution
KW - Dosing flexibility
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119936724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119936724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prdoa.2021.100115
DO - 10.1016/j.prdoa.2021.100115
M3 - Article
C2 - 34888518
AN - SCOPUS:85119936724
SN - 2590-1125
VL - 5
SP - 100115
JO - Clinical Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
JF - Clinical Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
M1 - 100115
ER -