TY - JOUR
T1 - Ablative liver radiotherapy for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
T2 - Patterns of care and survival in the United States
AU - De, Brian
AU - Tran Cao, Hop S.
AU - Vauthey, Jean Nicolas
AU - Manzar, Gohar S.
AU - Corrigan, Kelsey L.
AU - Raghav, Kanwal P.S.
AU - Lee, Sunyoung S.
AU - Tzeng, Ching Wei D.
AU - Minsky, Bruce D.
AU - Smith, Grace L.
AU - Holliday, Emma B.
AU - Taniguchi, Cullen M.
AU - Koong, Albert C.
AU - Das, Prajnan
AU - Javle, Milind
AU - Ludmir, Ethan B.
AU - Koay, Eugene J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by Cancer Center Support (Core) grant P30 CA016672 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Brian De was supported by the Radiological Society of North America Research & Education Foundation through grant number RR2111. Ching-Wei D. Tzeng received research funding from PanTher Therapeutics to his institution. Eugene J. Koay was supported by grants from the Department of Defense (W81XWH-21-1-0709) and NIH (U54CA210181, U54CA143837, U01CA196403, U01CA200468, U01CA200468, U01CA214263, P50CA221707, R01CA221971, R01CA218004, P30CA016672). Ethan B. Ludmir was supported by the Andrew Sabin Family Fellowship. Brian De reports consulting honoraria from Sermo, Inc. Emma B. Holliday reports research funding from Merck Serono. Cullen M. Taniguchi reports a consulting/advisory role with Accuray. Albert C. Koong reports stock ownership in Aravive, Inc. Prajnan Das reports consulting/advisory fees from the National Cancer Institute and ASTRO and an honorarium for lectures for the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Ching-Wei D. Tzeng reports consulting fees from PanTher and Ethicon given to his institution. Eugene J. Koay reports grants from the National Institutes of Health, Stand Up 2 Cancer, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Philips Healthcare, Elekta, and GE Healthcare; personal fees from RenovoRx and Taylor and Francis; a consulting role with AstraZeneca; and a consulting/advisory role with Augmenix; honoraria for lectures at Apollo Cancer Hospitals, Bayer Healthcare, and Philips Healthcare; patent pending of design and fabrication of 3-dimensional printed oral stents; has served as cochair of Radiation Oncology Working Group for the International Cholangiocarcinoma Research Network; and stock ownership in Quantum Aurea Capital. All reported conflicts are outside of the submitted work. The other authors made no disclosures.
Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by Cancer Center Support (Core) grant P30 CA016672 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Brian De was supported by the Radiological Society of North America Research & Education Foundation through grant number RR2111. Ching‐Wei D. Tzeng received research funding from PanTher Therapeutics to his institution. Eugene J. Koay was supported by grants from the Department of Defense (W81XWH‐21‐1‐0709) and NIH (U54CA210181, U54CA143837, U01CA196403, U01CA200468, U01CA200468, U01CA214263, P50CA221707, R01CA221971, R01CA218004, P30CA016672). Ethan B. Ludmir was supported by the Andrew Sabin Family Fellowship.
Funding Information:
Brian De reports consulting honoraria from Sermo, Inc. Emma B. Holliday reports research funding from Merck Serono. Cullen M. Taniguchi reports a consulting/advisory role with Accuray. Albert C. Koong reports stock ownership in Aravive, Inc. Prajnan Das reports consulting/advisory fees from the National Cancer Institute and ASTRO and an honorarium for lectures for the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Ching‐Wei D. Tzeng reports consulting fees from PanTher and Ethicon given to his institution. Eugene J. Koay reports grants from the National Institutes of Health, Stand Up 2 Cancer, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Philips Healthcare, Elekta, and GE Healthcare; personal fees from RenovoRx and Taylor and Francis; a consulting role with AstraZeneca; and a consulting/advisory role with Augmenix; honoraria for lectures at Apollo Cancer Hospitals, Bayer Healthcare, and Philips Healthcare; patent pending of design and fabrication of 3‐dimensional printed oral stents; has served as cochair of Radiation Oncology Working Group for the International Cholangiocarcinoma Research Network; and stock ownership in Quantum Aurea Capital. All reported conflicts are outside of the submitted work. The other authors made no disclosures.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Cancer Society.
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - Background: Single-institution studies have shown the oncologic benefit of ablative liver radiotherapy (A-RT) for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, adoption of A-RT across the United States and its associated outcomes are unknown. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Data Base for nonsurgically managed patients with ICC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018. Patients were labeled A-RT for receipt of biologically effective doses (BED10) ≥ 80.5 Gy and conventional RT (Conv-RT) for lower doses. Associations with A-RT use and overall survival were identified using logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Results: Of 27,571 patients, the most common treatments were chemotherapy without liver RT (45%), no chemotherapy or liver RT (42%), and liver RT ± chemotherapy (13%). Use of liver RT remained constant over time. Of 1112 patients receiving liver RT with known doses, RT was 73% Conv-RT (median BED10, 53 Gy; median, 20 fractions) and 27% A-RT (median BED10, 100 Gy; median, 5 fractions). Use of A-RT increased from 5% in 2004 to 48% in 2018 (Ptrend <.001). With a median follow-up of 52.3 months, median survival estimates for Conv-RT and A-RT were 12.8 and 23.7 months (P <.001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, stage III and IV disease correlated with a higher risk of death, whereas chemotherapy and A-RT correlated with a lower risk. Conclusions: Although A-RT has been increasingly used, use of liver RT as a whole in the United States remained constant despite growing evidence supporting its use, suggesting continued unmet need. A-RT is associated with longer survival versus Conv-RT. Lay Summary: Bile duct cancer is a rare, deadly disease that often presents at advanced stages. Single-institution retrospective studies have demonstrated that use of high-dose radiotherapy may be associated with longer survival, but larger studies have not been conducted. We used a large, national cancer registry of patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 to show that liver radiotherapy use remains low in the United States, despite growing evidence that patients who receive it live longer. Furthermore, we showed that patients who received high-dose radiotherapy lived longer than those who received lower doses. Greater awareness of the benefits of liver radiotherapy is needed to improve patient outcomes.
AB - Background: Single-institution studies have shown the oncologic benefit of ablative liver radiotherapy (A-RT) for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, adoption of A-RT across the United States and its associated outcomes are unknown. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Data Base for nonsurgically managed patients with ICC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018. Patients were labeled A-RT for receipt of biologically effective doses (BED10) ≥ 80.5 Gy and conventional RT (Conv-RT) for lower doses. Associations with A-RT use and overall survival were identified using logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Results: Of 27,571 patients, the most common treatments were chemotherapy without liver RT (45%), no chemotherapy or liver RT (42%), and liver RT ± chemotherapy (13%). Use of liver RT remained constant over time. Of 1112 patients receiving liver RT with known doses, RT was 73% Conv-RT (median BED10, 53 Gy; median, 20 fractions) and 27% A-RT (median BED10, 100 Gy; median, 5 fractions). Use of A-RT increased from 5% in 2004 to 48% in 2018 (Ptrend <.001). With a median follow-up of 52.3 months, median survival estimates for Conv-RT and A-RT were 12.8 and 23.7 months (P <.001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, stage III and IV disease correlated with a higher risk of death, whereas chemotherapy and A-RT correlated with a lower risk. Conclusions: Although A-RT has been increasingly used, use of liver RT as a whole in the United States remained constant despite growing evidence supporting its use, suggesting continued unmet need. A-RT is associated with longer survival versus Conv-RT. Lay Summary: Bile duct cancer is a rare, deadly disease that often presents at advanced stages. Single-institution retrospective studies have demonstrated that use of high-dose radiotherapy may be associated with longer survival, but larger studies have not been conducted. We used a large, national cancer registry of patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 to show that liver radiotherapy use remains low in the United States, despite growing evidence that patients who receive it live longer. Furthermore, we showed that patients who received high-dose radiotherapy lived longer than those who received lower doses. Greater awareness of the benefits of liver radiotherapy is needed to improve patient outcomes.
KW - liver failure
KW - local therapy
KW - locally advanced
KW - metastatic
KW - primary liver cancer
KW - stereotactic body radiotherapy
KW - United States/epidemiology
KW - Humans
KW - Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Bile Duct Neoplasms/therapy
KW - Cholangiocarcinoma/therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128195798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128195798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.34223
DO - 10.1002/cncr.34223
M3 - Article
C2 - 35417569
AN - SCOPUS:85128195798
SN - 0008-543X
VL - 128
SP - 2529
EP - 2539
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
IS - 13
ER -