TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of human activity recognition methods
AU - Vrigkas, Michalis
AU - Nikou, Christophoros
AU - Kakadiaris, Ioannis A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Vrigkas, Nikou and Kakadiaris.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Recognizing human activities from video sequences or still images is a challenging task due to problems, such as background clutter, partial occlusion, changes in scale, viewpoint, lighting, and appearance. Many applications, including video surveillance systems, human-computer interaction, and robotics for human behavior characterization, require a multiple activity recognition system. In this work, we provide a detailed review of recent and state-of-the-art research advances in the field of human activity classification. We propose a categorization of human activity methodologies and discuss their advantages and limitations. In particular, we divide human activity classification methods into two large categories according to whether they use data from different modalities or not. Then, each of these categories is further analyzed into sub-categories, which reflect how they model human activities and what type of activities they are interested in. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the existing, publicly available human activity classification datasets and examine the requirements for an ideal human activity recognition dataset. Finally, we report the characteristics of future research directions and present some open issues on human activity recognition.
AB - Recognizing human activities from video sequences or still images is a challenging task due to problems, such as background clutter, partial occlusion, changes in scale, viewpoint, lighting, and appearance. Many applications, including video surveillance systems, human-computer interaction, and robotics for human behavior characterization, require a multiple activity recognition system. In this work, we provide a detailed review of recent and state-of-the-art research advances in the field of human activity classification. We propose a categorization of human activity methodologies and discuss their advantages and limitations. In particular, we divide human activity classification methods into two large categories according to whether they use data from different modalities or not. Then, each of these categories is further analyzed into sub-categories, which reflect how they model human activities and what type of activities they are interested in. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the existing, publicly available human activity classification datasets and examine the requirements for an ideal human activity recognition dataset. Finally, we report the characteristics of future research directions and present some open issues on human activity recognition.
KW - Action representation
KW - Activity categorization
KW - Activity datasets
KW - Human activity recognition
KW - Review
KW - Survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019106855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019106855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/frobt.2015.00028
DO - 10.3389/frobt.2015.00028
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85019106855
VL - 2
JO - Frontiers Robotics AI
JF - Frontiers Robotics AI
SN - 2296-9144
IS - NOV
M1 - 28
ER -