TY - JOUR
T1 - A renewed model of pancreatic cancer evolution based on genomic rearrangement patterns
AU - Notta, Faiyaz
AU - Chan-Seng-Yue, Michelle
AU - Lemire, Mathieu
AU - Li, Yilong
AU - Wilson, Gavin W.
AU - Connor, Ashton A.
AU - Denroche, Robert E.
AU - Liang, Sheng Ben
AU - Brown, Andrew M.K.
AU - Kim, Jaeseung C.
AU - Wang, Tao
AU - Simpson, Jared T.
AU - Beck, Timothy
AU - Borgida, Ayelet
AU - Buchner, Nicholas
AU - Chadwick, Dianne
AU - Hafezi-Bakhtiari, Sara
AU - Dick, John E.
AU - Heisler, Lawrence
AU - Hollingsworth, Michael A.
AU - Ibrahimov, Emin
AU - Jang, Gun Ho
AU - Johns, Jeremy
AU - Jorgensen, Lars G.T.
AU - Law, Calvin
AU - Ludkovski, Olga
AU - Lungu, Ilinca
AU - Ng, Karen
AU - Pasternack, Danielle
AU - Petersen, Gloria M.
AU - Shlush, Liran I.
AU - Timms, Lee
AU - Tsao, Ming Sound
AU - Wilson, Julie M.
AU - Yung, Christina K.
AU - Zogopoulos, George
AU - Bartlett, John M.S.
AU - Alexandrov, Ludmil B.
AU - Real, Francisco X.
AU - Cleary, Sean P.
AU - Roehrl, Michael H.
AU - McPherson, John D.
AU - Stein, Lincoln D.
AU - Hudson, Thomas J.
AU - Campbell, Peter J.
AU - Gallinger, Steven
N1 - Funding Information:
This study include grants to the Pancreatic Cancer Sequencing Initiative program from the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR), through support from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, the Canada Foundation for Innovation; research award to F.N. from the OICR and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Pancreatic cancer, a highly aggressive tumour type with uniformly poor prognosis, exemplifies the classically held view of stepwise cancer development. The current model of tumorigenesis, based on analyses of precursor lesions, termed pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasm (PanINs) lesions, makes two predictions: first, that pancreatic cancer develops through a particular sequence of genetic alterations (KRAS, followed by CDKN2A, then TP53 and SMAD4); and second, that the evolutionary trajectory of pancreatic cancer progression is gradual because each alteration is acquired independently. A shortcoming of this model is that clonally expanded precursor lesions do not always belong to the tumour lineage, indicating that the evolutionary trajectory of the tumour lineage and precursor lesions can be divergent. This prevailing model of tumorigenesis has contributed to the clinical notion that pancreatic cancer evolves slowly and presents at a late stage. However, the propensity for this disease to rapidly metastasize and the inability to improve patient outcomes, despite efforts aimed at early detection, suggest that pancreatic cancer progression is not gradual. Here, using newly developed informatics tools, we tracked changes in DNA copy number and their associated rearrangements in tumour-enriched genomes and found that pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis is neither gradual nor follows the accepted mutation order. Two-thirds of tumours harbour complex rearrangement patterns associated with mitotic errors, consistent with punctuated equilibrium as the principal evolutionary trajectory. In a subset of cases, the consequence of such errors is the simultaneous, rather than sequential, knockout of canonical preneoplastic genetic drivers that are likely to set-off invasive cancer growth. These findings challenge the current progression model of pancreatic cancer and provide insights into the mutational processes that give rise to these aggressive tumours.
AB - Pancreatic cancer, a highly aggressive tumour type with uniformly poor prognosis, exemplifies the classically held view of stepwise cancer development. The current model of tumorigenesis, based on analyses of precursor lesions, termed pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasm (PanINs) lesions, makes two predictions: first, that pancreatic cancer develops through a particular sequence of genetic alterations (KRAS, followed by CDKN2A, then TP53 and SMAD4); and second, that the evolutionary trajectory of pancreatic cancer progression is gradual because each alteration is acquired independently. A shortcoming of this model is that clonally expanded precursor lesions do not always belong to the tumour lineage, indicating that the evolutionary trajectory of the tumour lineage and precursor lesions can be divergent. This prevailing model of tumorigenesis has contributed to the clinical notion that pancreatic cancer evolves slowly and presents at a late stage. However, the propensity for this disease to rapidly metastasize and the inability to improve patient outcomes, despite efforts aimed at early detection, suggest that pancreatic cancer progression is not gradual. Here, using newly developed informatics tools, we tracked changes in DNA copy number and their associated rearrangements in tumour-enriched genomes and found that pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis is neither gradual nor follows the accepted mutation order. Two-thirds of tumours harbour complex rearrangement patterns associated with mitotic errors, consistent with punctuated equilibrium as the principal evolutionary trajectory. In a subset of cases, the consequence of such errors is the simultaneous, rather than sequential, knockout of canonical preneoplastic genetic drivers that are likely to set-off invasive cancer growth. These findings challenge the current progression model of pancreatic cancer and provide insights into the mutational processes that give rise to these aggressive tumours.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992386135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992386135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nature19823
DO - 10.1038/nature19823
M3 - Article
C2 - 27732578
AN - SCOPUS:84992386135
VL - 538
SP - 378
EP - 382
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
SN - 0028-0836
IS - 7625
ER -