Abstract
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing teicoplanin and vancomycin for the treatment of gram-positive bacteremias in neutropenic patients, teicoplanin was given at 6 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h intravenously (iv) after initial loading every 12 h for three doses, while vancomycin was administered at 15 mg/kg every 12 h iv. At enrollment, both groups were comparable in age, sex, underlying hematologic or neoplastic disorder, baseline renal functions, and incidence of neutropenia. Treatment was successful in 19 (90%) of 21 patients who received teicoplanin and 24 (96%) of 25 who received vancomycin (P = .58). Adverse reactions occurred more often in the vancomycin group (31%) than in the teicoplanin group (9%; P = .06) and were primarily cutaneous or gastrointestinal. In conclusion, teicoplanin was better tolerated than vancomycin, and no statistically significant difference in efficacy was detected with the sample size in this study.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 350-355 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Infectious Diseases |
| Volume | 169 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1994 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Immunology and Allergy
- Infectious Diseases
Divisions
- Infectious Disease
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized double-blind trial of vancomycin versus teicoplanin for the treatment of gram-positive bacteremia in patients with cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS