A randomized controlled trial of clean intermittent self-catheterization versus suprapubic catheterization after urogynecologic surgery

Mary L. Jannelli, Jennifer M. Wu, Linda W. Plunkett, Kathryn S. Williams, Anthony G. Visco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of significant bacteruria between clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) and suprapubic catheterization (SPC) after urogynecologic surgery. Study Design: Patients were randomized to CISC or SPC. A urinalysis and patient satisfaction questionnaire were conducted on postoperative days 2 and 7. Urine culture was performed for positive urinalysis. Significant bacteruria was defined as > 100,000 cfu/mL. To detect a decrease in bacteruria risk from 25% to 10%, 113 subjects per group were needed with 80% power and α of 0.05. Results: Of 248 randomized patients, 210 were included in the final analysis. The overall risk of bacteruria was 27% with no difference between SPC and CISC (31% vs 23%, P = .23). Patients reported more frustration (P = .01) and more difficulty (P = .003) using CISC. Conclusion: There was no difference in risk of significant bacteruria between CISC and SPC. Patients reported more frustration and difficulty with self-catheterization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72.e1-72.e4
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume197
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Keywords

  • clean intermittent self-catheterization
  • postoperative bladder drainage
  • significant bacteruria
  • suprapubic catheterization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized controlled trial of clean intermittent self-catheterization versus suprapubic catheterization after urogynecologic surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this