TY - JOUR
T1 - A new system for custom helical mandibular distraction
T2 - a cadaver test
AU - Gateno, J.
AU - Bartlett, S.
AU - Kim, Daeseung
AU - Gonzalez, C.
AU - Xue, Amy Shengnan
AU - Xia, J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Currently, internal mandibular distraction osteogenesis is performed with stock distractors that are either linear or circular. However, a recent in silico study showed that linear and circular distractions resulted in bone deformity, malocclusion, and condylar displacement, while custom helical distractors produced excellent outcomes. A system to design and manufacture custom helical distractors has recently been developed. An unpublished in vitro study showed excellent outcomes with custom helical devices manufactured using this system. However, it is unknown whether these appliances will work in human tissues. Hence, the current study was performed to determine first, in a cadaver model, whether the new system of custom helical distraction can produce appropriate clinical outcomes; and second, to contrast the performance of the custom helical distractors with those of stock and hybrid (i.e., linear appliances that feature patient-specific footplates) devices. The results demonstrated that the new system of custom helical distraction could produce appropriate clinical outcomes in the cadaver model. Also, the new custom helical distractors operated as intended. Interpreted as trends, the best results of this study were seen with the helical distractors, followed by the hybrid devices and lastly the stock appliances.
AB - Currently, internal mandibular distraction osteogenesis is performed with stock distractors that are either linear or circular. However, a recent in silico study showed that linear and circular distractions resulted in bone deformity, malocclusion, and condylar displacement, while custom helical distractors produced excellent outcomes. A system to design and manufacture custom helical distractors has recently been developed. An unpublished in vitro study showed excellent outcomes with custom helical devices manufactured using this system. However, it is unknown whether these appliances will work in human tissues. Hence, the current study was performed to determine first, in a cadaver model, whether the new system of custom helical distraction can produce appropriate clinical outcomes; and second, to contrast the performance of the custom helical distractors with those of stock and hybrid (i.e., linear appliances that feature patient-specific footplates) devices. The results demonstrated that the new system of custom helical distraction could produce appropriate clinical outcomes in the cadaver model. Also, the new custom helical distractors operated as intended. Interpreted as trends, the best results of this study were seen with the helical distractors, followed by the hybrid devices and lastly the stock appliances.
KW - Cadaver
KW - Cone-beam computed tomography
KW - Craniofacial abnormalities
KW - Distraction osteogenesis
KW - Maxilla
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001925117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105001925117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.03.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.03.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001925117
SN - 0901-5027
JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
ER -