Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Sham-controlled Trial Assessing the EndoBarrier Duodenal-jejunal Bypass Liner for the Treatment of Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Concomitant Obesity: The ENDO Trial

Christopher C. Thompson, Pichamol Jirapinyo, Thomas R. McCarty, Stacy Brethauer, Nicholas Shaheen, Shelby A. Sullivan, Timothy Koch, Barham K. Abu Dayyeh, Erik B. Wilson, Allison R. Schulman, W. Scott Butsch, Keith S. Gersin, Caroline M. Apovian, Philip Schauer

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An endoscopically placed duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) may provide a safe adjunctive therapy for those with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity.

BACKGROUND: Although some endoscopic therapies have been shown to improve glycemic indices secondary to weight loss, small bowel interventions may have direct metabolic effects. A meta-analysis of observational studies demonstrated reduction in HbA1c by 1.3% at 1 year after DJBL in patients with T2DM and obesity.

METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial comparing DJBL to sham procedure with medical management and lifestyle modification. Primary endpoints included mean difference in changes in HbA1c at 12 months between arms, and device-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary endpoints included percent total weight loss (%TWL) and subjects achieving HbA1c≤7% and TWL≥5% at 12 months.

RESULTS: Three hundred twenty subjects were randomized to DJBL (n=212) and sham (n=108). Baseline HbA1c and BMI were 8.79±0.92% and 38.45±5.75 kg/m 2 . On modified intent-to-treat analysis, change in HbA1c at 12 months was -1.10±1.45% and -0.28±1.54% for DJBL and sham groups, respectively ( P =0.0004). Rate of device-related SAEs was 9.4% including intolerance (3.7%), hemorrhage (2.8%), and hepatic abscess (2.3% stopping study early). At 12 months, DJBL group experienced greater weight loss compared with sham (7.7±9.6% TWL and 2.1±5.4% TWL, respectively; P <0.0001), with significantly more patients achieving HbA1c ≤ 7% (28.3% vs. 9.4%; P <0.0003) and TWL ≥ 5% (60.4% vs. 21.3%; P <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: DJBL met primary glycemic control efficacy and primary safety endpoints, while providing clinically significant weight loss, and comorbidity improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-42
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume284
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2026

Keywords

  • bariatric endoscopy
  • DJBL
  • duodenal jejunal bypass liner
  • EBMT
  • endobarrier
  • endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapy
  • fractyl
  • obesity
  • type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
  • Male
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications
  • Weight Loss
  • Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism
  • Bariatric Surgery/methods
  • Female
  • Obesity/surgery
  • Duodenum/surgery
  • Jejunum/surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Divisions

  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Sham-controlled Trial Assessing the EndoBarrier Duodenal-jejunal Bypass Liner for the Treatment of Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Concomitant Obesity: The ENDO Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this