A digital library for increasing awareness about living donor kidney transplants: Formative study

Amy D. Waterman, Emily H. Wood, Omesh N. Ranasinghe, Amanda Faye Lipsey, Crystal Anderson, Wendy Balliet, Lauren Holland-Carter, Stacey Maurer, Maria Aurora Posadas Salas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Background: It is not common for people to come across a living kidney donor, let alone consider whether they would ever donate a kidney themselves while they are alive. Narrative storytelling, the sharing of first-person narratives based on lived experience, may be an important way to improve education about living donor kidney transplants (LDKTs). Developing ways to easily standardize and disseminate diverse living donor stories using digital technology could inspire more people to consider becoming living donors and reduce the kidney shortage nationally. Objective: This paper aimed to describe the development of the Living Donation Storytelling Project, a web-based digital library of living donation narratives from multiple audiences using video capture technology. Specifically, we aimed to describe the theoretical foundation and development of the library, a protocol to capture diverse storytellers, the characteristics and experiences of participating storytellers, and the frequency with which any ethical concerns about the content being shared emerged. Methods: This study invited kidney transplant recipients who had received LDKTs, living donors, family members, and patients seeking LDKTs to record personal stories using video capture technology by answering a series of guided prompts on their computer or smartphone and answering questions about their filming experience. The digital software automatically spliced responses to open-ended prompts, creating a seamless story available for uploading to a web-based library and posting to social media. Each story was reviewed by a transplant professional for the disclosure of protected health information (PHI), pressuring others to donate, and medical inaccuracies. Disclosures were edited. Results: This study recruited diverse storytellers through social media, support groups, churches, and transplant programs. Of the 137 storytellers who completed the postsurvey, 105/137 (76.6%) were white and 99/137 (72.2%) were female. They spent 62.5 min, on average, recording their story, with a final median story length of 10 min (00:46 seconds to 32:16 min). A total of 94.8% (130/137) of storytellers were motivated by a desire to educate the public; 78.1% (107/137) were motivated to help more people become living donors; and 75.9% (104/137) were motivated to dispel myths. The ease of using the technology and telling their story varied, with the fear of being on film, emotional difficulty talking about their experiences, and some technological barriers being reported. PHI, most commonly surnames and transplant center names, was present in 62.9% (85/135) of stories and was edited out. Conclusions: With appropriate sensitivity to ensure diverse recruitment, ethical review of content, and support for storytellers, web-based storytelling platforms may be a cost-effective and convenient way to further engage patients and increase the curiosity of the public in learning more about the possibility of becoming living donors.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article numbere17441
    JournalJMIR Formative Research
    Volume4
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2020

    Keywords

    • Awareness
    • Diffusion of innovation
    • Digital library
    • Health education
    • Health literacy
    • Health technology
    • Informed decision-making
    • Kidney diseases
    • Living donation
    • Living donor kidney transplant
    • Mobile phone
    • Video library

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health Informatics
    • Medicine (miscellaneous)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A digital library for increasing awareness about living donor kidney transplants: Formative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this