TY - JOUR
T1 - A Contextual Look at Safe Routes to School Implementation in Texas
AU - Atteberry, Heather
AU - Dowdy, Diane
AU - Oluyomi, Abiodun
AU - Nichols, Donna
AU - Ory, Marcia G.
AU - Hoelscher, Deanna M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, with partial funding from the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation through the Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, and contributions from the University of Texas School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center School of Public Health, Texas Health Institute, and Live Smart Texas.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, 2015 SAGE Publications.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - In an effort to understand factors influencing the implementation and outcomes of the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program in Texas, interviews were conducted in 2014 with 34 community- and state-level stakeholders involved in the 2007 SRTS grant program. Participants were asked a series of multiple-choice and open-ended questions about SRTS program planning, implementation, and sustainability. Transcribed responses were organized and grouped according to thematic elements using standard qualitative methods. Results indicate the SRTS program was perceived as beneficial by providing funds for both infrastructure and education projects. Although most community representatives reported accomplishments toward planned goals (improved infrastructure and perceived increase in active commuting), many had significant challenges including lack of communication and up-front funding, and difficulty navigating the regulatory process. Future SRTS programs should be structured to be more compatible with community-based needs and limitations, provide adequate underlying infrastructure and resources, and include at least partial funding up-front.
AB - In an effort to understand factors influencing the implementation and outcomes of the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program in Texas, interviews were conducted in 2014 with 34 community- and state-level stakeholders involved in the 2007 SRTS grant program. Participants were asked a series of multiple-choice and open-ended questions about SRTS program planning, implementation, and sustainability. Transcribed responses were organized and grouped according to thematic elements using standard qualitative methods. Results indicate the SRTS program was perceived as beneficial by providing funds for both infrastructure and education projects. Although most community representatives reported accomplishments toward planned goals (improved infrastructure and perceived increase in active commuting), many had significant challenges including lack of communication and up-front funding, and difficulty navigating the regulatory process. Future SRTS programs should be structured to be more compatible with community-based needs and limitations, provide adequate underlying infrastructure and resources, and include at least partial funding up-front.
KW - active commuting to school
KW - child obesity
KW - physical activity
KW - policy implementation
KW - Safe Routes to School
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954321966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954321966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0013916515612254
DO - 10.1177/0013916515612254
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84954321966
SN - 0013-9165
VL - 48
SP - 192
EP - 209
JO - Environment and Behavior
JF - Environment and Behavior
IS - 1
ER -