TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of the sniff magnitude test and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in children and nonnative English speakers
AU - Frank, Robert A.
AU - Dulay, Mario F.
AU - Niergarth, Kristine A.
AU - Gesteland, Robert C.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Dr. Richard Doty, Jason Bailie and Konstantin Rybalsky for their helpful comments on draft versions of the paper. The research was supported by NIH SBIR grant DC04139, R.C. Gesteland, PI.
PY - 2004/5
Y1 - 2004/5
N2 - The sniff magnitude test (SMT) is a reliable and rapid clinical test of olfactory function that is minimally dependent on cognitive and linguistic abilities. In this study, we compared performance on the SMT and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) in samples of children and nonnative English speakers. Previous research has shown that these populations perform poorly on the UPSIT as compared with young, healthy U.S. adults. Such performance differences may reflect variations in memory/cognition and language/culture rather than olfactory abilities. The UPSIT scores of children and of Indian and Chinese graduate students were found to be lower than those of young U.S. adults. By contrast, these groups did not perform more poorly than U.S. adults did on the SMT. The results are consistent with findings from our studies, with the elderly showing that performance on the UPSIT, but not the SMT, is significantly correlated with measures of memory, language and other cognitive abilities. The findings highlight the utility of the SMT when evaluating the olfactory ability of the very young, older adults and people with diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds.
AB - The sniff magnitude test (SMT) is a reliable and rapid clinical test of olfactory function that is minimally dependent on cognitive and linguistic abilities. In this study, we compared performance on the SMT and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) in samples of children and nonnative English speakers. Previous research has shown that these populations perform poorly on the UPSIT as compared with young, healthy U.S. adults. Such performance differences may reflect variations in memory/cognition and language/culture rather than olfactory abilities. The UPSIT scores of children and of Indian and Chinese graduate students were found to be lower than those of young U.S. adults. By contrast, these groups did not perform more poorly than U.S. adults did on the SMT. The results are consistent with findings from our studies, with the elderly showing that performance on the UPSIT, but not the SMT, is significantly correlated with measures of memory, language and other cognitive abilities. The findings highlight the utility of the SMT when evaluating the olfactory ability of the very young, older adults and people with diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds.
KW - Anosmia
KW - Children
KW - Hyposmia
KW - Language and olfactory assessment
KW - Olfaction
KW - Smell loss
KW - Sniffing
KW - UPSIT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342652873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342652873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.020
DO - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 15135019
AN - SCOPUS:2342652873
SN - 0031-9384
VL - 81
SP - 475
EP - 480
JO - Physiology and Behavior
JF - Physiology and Behavior
IS - 3
ER -