TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in postcholecystectomy jaundice
AU - Ertan, Atilla
AU - Kandilci, Ugur
AU - Danisoglu, Vecihe
AU - Aktan, Hamdi
AU - Paykoc, Zafer
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1981/3
Y1 - 1981/3
N2 - The Chiba percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (CPTC) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are new techniques useful for accurately diagnosing cholestasis. Both, however, present certain advantages and disadvantages in different clinical settings. In our prospective study we compared and evaluated the two techniques in 21 patients with postcholecystectomy jaundice, analyzing success rate, complications, time spent, and costs. We found CPTC was preferable to ERCP for visualizing the bile ducts and for relative safety. Moreover, CPTC is not only more rapid, but also requires less expertise and costs less.
AB - The Chiba percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (CPTC) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are new techniques useful for accurately diagnosing cholestasis. Both, however, present certain advantages and disadvantages in different clinical settings. In our prospective study we compared and evaluated the two techniques in 21 patients with postcholecystectomy jaundice, analyzing success rate, complications, time spent, and costs. We found CPTC was preferable to ERCP for visualizing the bile ducts and for relative safety. Moreover, CPTC is not only more rapid, but also requires less expertise and costs less.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019513380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019513380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00004836-198103000-00014
DO - 10.1097/00004836-198103000-00014
M3 - Article
C2 - 7276494
AN - SCOPUS:0019513380
SN - 0192-0790
VL - 3
SP - 67
EP - 72
JO - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
JF - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
IS - 1
ER -