5-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis

John K. Forrest, Steven J. Yakubov, G. Michael Deeb, Hemal Gada, Mubashir A. Mumtaz, Basel Ramlawi, Tanvir Bajwa, John Crouch, William Merhi, Stephane Leung Wai Sang, Neal S. Kleiman, George Petrossian, Newell B. Robinson, Paul Sorajja, Ayman Iskander, Pierre Berthoumieu, Didier Tchétché, Christopher Feindel, Eric M. Horlick, Shigeru SaitoJae K. Oh, Yoojin Jung, Michael J. Reardon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Evolut Low Risk trial demonstrated that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was noninferior to surgery for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. Outcomes at 5 years have not been reported. Objectives: This study sought to evaluate 5-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes with TAVR vs surgery in patients from the Evolut Low Risk trial. Methods: We randomly assigned low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis to TAVR or surgery. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke. Secondary endpoints included clinical, echocardiographic, and quality-of-life outcomes through 5 years. Results: A total of 1,414 patients underwent an attempted implant (n = 730 TAVR, n = 684 surgery). The mean age was 74 years (range 51-88 years), and women accounted for 35% of patients. At 5 years the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke was 15.5% for the TAVR group and 16.4% for the surgery group (P = 0.47). The Kaplan-Meier estimates in the TAVR and surgery groups for all-cause mortality were 13.5% and 14.9% (P = 0.39) and for disabling stroke were 3.6% and 4.0% (P = 0.57). Cardiovascular mortality was 7.2% in the TAVR group and 9.3% in the surgery group (P = 0.15). Noncardiovascular mortality in the TAVR group was 6.8% and 6.2% in the surgery group (P = 0.73). A site-level vital status sweep was performed for patients who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study. With the addition of these patients, the all-cause mortality rate at 5 years for patients undergoing TAVR was 14.7% and for surgery was 15.2% (P = 0.74). Over 5 years, valve reintervention rate was 3.3% for TAVR and 2.5% for surgery (P = 0.44). A sustained improvement in quality of life was observed in both treatment arms with mean Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire summary score of 88.3 ± 15.8 in TAVR and 88.5 ± 15.8 in surgery. Conclusions: At 5 years, patients with severe aortic stenosis who were treated with either TAVR or surgery had comparable rates of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke. Valve durability and performance were excellent in both arms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1523-1532
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume85
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 22 2025

Keywords

  • TAVR
  • aortic stenosis
  • low-risk
  • supra-annular self-expanding
  • surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '5-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this